ppd91e9747.png
ppc8cc508b.png
Latest News
Image © www.hughanderson.co.uk
All content and images are © www.burybombers.org.uk
Website created by Hugh Anderson
Bury Bombers Wheelchair Basketball Club
pp88db15e5.jpg
pp2185f46f.jpg
ppf271465b.jpg
pp8b6bae0f.jpg
Homepage
Team History
Latest News
Fixtures 2010/2011
Contacts & Club Info
Picture Galleries
Club Members
Team Events & Info
Links
Guestbook
Previous Results
pp7d852f45.jpg
pp88db15e5.jpg
pp0af848fc.jpg
ppf271465b.jpg
ppb03bca2d.jpg
ppb910d0fb.jpg
pp57c1ba60.jpg
Club Diary
pp93f9484e.jpg
THE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

The classification system for Wheelchair Basketball is a method by which each individual has an equal opportunity to compete. There are no reasonable arguments to exclude any individual from competition because of the nature, cause or degree (severity) of disability.

The rules state that: Art. 59 Player Classification Point System, "Player classifications ... shall have point values as follows: 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5. In international competition, at no time in a game shall a team have players participating whose total point value exceeds 14 points.  In the UK domestic league and cup competitions, a team may add 1.5 to the team classification total for each women player on court, when competing in mixed competition.  Similarly, a team may add 1.0 points to the team classification total for each male junior player on court.  A Junior player is one who is under 19 years of age at midnight on 31st December in the current season).

The skills (talents) and the level of training of a player are not the subject of the classification system. It should only measure functional limitations caused by the physical disability which affects the players capability for performing the different skills. The level of trunk function directly affects the performance capability in regard to the different skills involved. Therefore the level of sitting balance and trunk movement of the athletes become the fundamental elements in the definition of the classes. The definition of the classes necessitates a description of the borderline between cases.

PRIMARY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLASS I AND II ATHLETES

The following is typical of Class I athletes:

· they use a high back on their chair;
· they lose their balance when lifting both arms over their head at the same time;
· they use both arms when lifting their trunk from their thighs;
· they have an inability to turn the head far enough when trying to look behind them;
· they have an inability to sit without support during a high ball situation.

In contrast the Class II athlete can:
· use a lower backed chair;
· use only one arm when supporting the movements of the trunk;
· possess fair balance when lifting both hands over the head or when in a high ball situation;
· show deliberate dorsal flexion of the trunk.

Athletes with arm impairments are Class I, if they show significant functional limitations when pushing and steering the wheelchair in any direction, or catching a normal pass by preferring to use one hand only
.
PRIMARY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CLASS II AND III ATHLETES
Class II athletes cannot raise their trunk from their lap without the support of one arm. They are not able to start pushing the chair with only one hand and bouncing the ball simultaneously or wheeling and bouncing the ball at high speed. They easily lose their balance in rebound situations.

Class III athletes show deliberate trunk movements in the sagittal plane at least. They can pick up the ball with both hands from in front of their footplates, dribble with one hand without restriction and steer by crossing the free arm to grasp the opposite wheel.
Classification I
1  2  3  4  5  6  7